These verified case studies demonstrate how Polydigi Solutions Ltd Evidence Architecture enabled regulatory reconsideration, financial recovery, and institutional accountability. Each case includes verifiable regulatory or court reference identifiers confirming real institutional intervention and measurable outcomes.
A regulatory complaint initially declined was reconstructed using structured evidence architecture, including timeline reconstruction, evidentiary relationship mapping, and procedural defect identification.
Following formal judicial proceedings, the regulatory authority formally undertook to withdraw its previous position and reopen the investigation under a new case manager. The court subsequently ordered the respondent to pay the petitioner’s legal expenses.
This intervention demonstrates the effectiveness of structured evidence architecture in enabling regulatory reconsideration and judicially recognised procedural correction.
Fragmented billing records and inconsistent meter data were reconstructed using structured evidentiary modelling. Evidence architecture revealed institutional data inconsistencies and procedural failures.
The regulatory authority confirmed incorrect billing methodology and required the energy provider to correct billing calculations, update national database records, apply financial correction, and issue formal written apology.
This case demonstrates how structured evidence reconstruction enables regulatory authorities to identify institutional errors and enforce corrective action.